The Trained Nose

Acqua di Giò against Acqua di Giò Eau de Parfum

One number per era rather than one number overall — two fragrances can be near-identical at the opening and different things by the evening, and an average hides exactly that.
Giorgio Armani

Acqua di Giò

Aquatic Woody · lasts about 5.7 h
Giorgio Armani

Acqua di Giò Eau de Parfum

· lasts about 4.9 h

How close, and when

Across a whole wearing, Giorgio Armani Acqua di Giò and Giorgio Armani Acqua di Giò Eau de Parfum are related, not interchangeable. They are nearest during the drydown and furthest apart in the heart, which is the part a single figure would average away.

55% opening · 0–1 h
41% heart · 1–3 h
62% drydown · 3–8 h
Measured across all twenty-four facets, from the notes below — not from the families on the boxes. They share 1 of 28 materials, which is worth holding beside the figures: a pair can share almost nothing and still converge, because different materials can smell of the same things.

What AKIN predicts

AKIN predicts these two are alike, and the evidence behind that is substantial.

Two signals sit on this page and are never averaged: what the note pyramids measure these two to share, and what AKIN’s resemblance graph predicts. Where they part, that is the finding rather than a fault.

The pyramids, side by side

Compared by material rather than by spelling, so a note recorded two ways is not counted as a difference.
top
Acqua di Giò only — Bergamot, Jasmine, Lemon, Lime, Mandarin Orange Blossom, Neroli, Orange
Acqua di Giò Eau de Parfum only — Green Mandarin
heart
Acqua di Giò only — Coriander, Cyclamen, Freesia, Hyacinth, Jasmine, Mignonette, Nutmeg, Peach, Rose, Rosemary, Violet
Acqua di Giò Eau de Parfum only — Clary Sage, Geranium, Lavender
base
both — Patchouli
Acqua di Giò only — Amber, Cedar, Oakmoss, White Musk
Acqua di Giò Eau de Parfum only — Vetiver

Other comparisons worth reading

Pairs involving one of these two where the notes are fully recorded on both sides and AKIN has enough evidence for the pair to be worth reading.